ASC 360 Compliance: A Complete Guide to Property, Plant, and Equipment Accounting

ASC 360 is one of the most important accounting standards under US GAAP for companies managing property, plant, and equipment. It defines how organizations must account for acquisition, depreciation, impairment, and disposal of long-lived assets. In practice, ASC 360 compliance ensures that financial statements reflect the true economic value of assets, avoiding distortions that can affect decision-making, investor confidence, and regulatory oversight.

From manufacturing plants that face sudden market downturns to technology firms dealing with asset write-downs, understanding ASC 360 is essential for accuracy, transparency, and compliance. This guide explains the key principles of ASC 360, disclosure requirements, impairment testing, depreciation methods, and how it compares with international standards—giving you the clarity needed to stay compliant and aligned with best practices.

What Is ASC 360 and Why Does It Matter?

ASC 360 is a US GAAP accounting standard issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) that provides guidance on how to account for property, plant, and equipment (PPE). It establishes the rules for acquisition, depreciation, impairment, and disposal of long-lived assets. In other words, it ensures that companies report the economic reality of their assets, not just historical costs on paper.

This standard matters because inaccurate asset accounting can distort financial statements, mislead investors, and create compliance risks. For example, if a manufacturing plant records equipment at its book value without recognizing a significant decline in market value, stakeholders may overestimate the company’s financial health. ASC 360 introduces clear procedures to test for impairment, measure fair value, and adjust carrying amounts when necessary.

Beyond compliance, ASC 360 also supports strategic decision-making. Executives rely on accurate asset valuations to negotiate contracts, assess expansion plans, and manage risks. By aligning reporting with ASC 360, businesses gain transparency, protect investor trust, and avoid regulatory penalties—all of which are critical in today’s competitive and highly regulated environment.

Entities Required to Comply With ASC 360

Compliance with ASC 360 is not optional—it applies to all organizations that prepare financial statements under US GAAP. This includes:

• Public companies listed on US stock exchanges, where compliance is essential to maintain investor confidence and meet SEC requirements.
• Private companies that prepare audited financial statements or seek financing based on GAAP reporting.
• Government entities and nonprofit organizations that follow GAAP for accountability and transparency.
• Multinational corporations with US subsidiaries that must align reporting with ASC 360 while also reconciling with international standards such as IAS 36.

While the core principles of ASC 360 apply universally, the practical implications vary by sector. For example, a utility company may face significant asset retirement obligations when decommissioning plants, while a technology firm may need to test specialized equipment for impairment after rapid innovation cycles.

The common thread is that all entities using GAAP must ensure accurate accounting of property, plant, and equipment. Failing to comply can result in misstated earnings, audit findings, and potential regulatory scrutiny—issues that no organization can afford to overlook.

Key Disclosure Requirements Under ASC 360

One of the most important aspects of ASC 360 compliance is disclosure. Financial statements must provide enough information for stakeholders to understand how assets are valued, depreciated, and impaired. The goal is transparency—helping investors, regulators, and auditors see how numbers reflect reality.

Under ASC 360, companies must disclose:

• Assumptions used to determine fair value
  For example, whether valuations were based on discounted cash flow, market comparables, or independent appraisals.
  
• Reconciliation of asset balances
  Opening and closing balances of property, plant, and equipment, adjusted for acquisitions, disposals, or impairment losses.
  
• Capital expenditures during the period
  Investments made to acquire or improve long-lived assets.
  
• Impairment charges recognized
  Including details on triggering events, affected asset groups, and the impact on financial results.
  
• Depreciation methods applied
  Whether the entity uses straight-line, accelerated, or other methods, along with the rationale for the choice.
  
• Information on leases of assets
  Details of leased property, plant, and equipment that fall under the scope of ASC 360.

These disclosures not only ensure regulatory compliance but also enhance stakeholder confidence. When businesses present clear and consistent disclosures, they provide decision-makers with the insight needed to assess risk, evaluate performance, and project future cash flows.

Asset Groups and Impairment Testing

A central concept in ASC 360 is the grouping of long-lived assets for impairment analysis. Instead of testing each asset in isolation, companies must evaluate them as part of an asset group—a collection of assets that together generate identifiable cash flows.

How Asset Groups Work

• An asset group might include machinery, facilities, and equipment that collectively support a manufacturing line.
• The group must be defined at the lowest level for which independent cash flows can be identified.
• Once defined, impairment testing is performed at this group level, not on individual assets, unless a single asset clearly generates independent cash inflows.

Held for Use vs. Held for Sale

• Assets held for use: These continue to operate in the business. Impairment testing compares the carrying amount to undiscounted cash flows. If impairment exists, the carrying value is adjusted down to fair value.
• Assets held for sale: These are measured at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell. Grouping is permitted if the assets will be disposed of in a single transaction.

Practical Example

Imagine a logistics company with a fleet of trucks. If market conditions significantly reduce freight demand, the fleet would be tested as a group, since the trucks collectively generate cash flows. For a plant closure, the facility and equipment associated with that plant would be grouped and tested together.

By requiring impairment testing at the asset group level, ASC 360 ensures that financial reporting reflects how assets actually contribute to business operations—providing a more realistic picture of financial health.

Impairment Indicators and Measurement of Loss

Under ASC 360, companies must regularly assess whether long-lived assets are impaired. This process begins by identifying indicators of impairment—signals that the carrying value of an asset or asset group may no longer be recoverable.

Common Impairment Indicators

• Significant decrease in market value of an asset.
• Adverse changes in legal or regulatory environment, such as new restrictions affecting asset use.
• Negative shifts in market or business climate, for example, declining demand or increased competition.
• Costs significantly exceeding expectations during acquisition or construction.
• Plans to dispose of or restructure operations that reduce the usefulness of assets.

Measuring Impairment Loss

Once an indicator is identified, the company performs a recoverability test:

1. Compare the carrying amount of the asset (or group) with the sum of expected future cash flows (undiscounted).
2. If the carrying amount exceeds cash flows, the asset is impaired.
3. The impairment loss is then measured as the difference between the carrying amount and the fair value of the asset.

Allocating Losses to Asset Groups

When testing at the asset group level, impairment losses are allocated pro-rata across all assets in the group, based on their carrying amounts.

Example in Practice

Suppose a manufacturing company owns specialized equipment recorded at $5 million. Due to a sharp drop in demand, expected cash flows total only $3.5 million. An appraisal sets fair value at $3.2 million. The company must recognize an impairment loss of $1.8 million, adjusting the carrying amount accordingly.

This structured approach ensures that financial statements present an accurate and timely reflection of asset value, protecting investors and guiding managers in strategic decisions.

Depreciation Methods Established by ASC 360

Depreciation is at the core of ASC 360, as it determines how the cost of long-lived assets is spread over their useful lives. The standard recognizes several acceptable methods, each suited to different business contexts.

1. Straight-Line Depreciation

• How it works: The cost of the asset is allocated evenly over its estimated useful life.
• When it’s useful: Common for office buildings, fixtures, or assets with predictable usage.
• Example: A $1,000,000 warehouse with a 20-year life depreciates $50,000 annually.

2. Accelerated Depreciation

• How it works: Larger depreciation expenses are recognized in the early years of an asset’s life, decreasing over time.
• When it’s useful: Best for technology or equipment that quickly loses value due to innovation or heavy initial use.
• Example: A company invests in specialized software that becomes obsolete within five years. Accelerated methods reflect the faster decline in utility.

3. Units-of-Production Depreciation

• How it works: Depreciation is tied to asset usage, such as hours of operation or units produced.
• When it’s useful: Appropriate for machinery, vehicles, or equipment where wear and tear depends on activity.
• Example: A mining truck depreciates based on tons of ore hauled rather than years in service.

4. Group Depreciation

• How it works: Similar assets with comparable useful lives are grouped together, and depreciation is calculated collectively.
• When it’s useful: Effective for fleets of vehicles, manufacturing tools, or identical machinery.
• Example: A company operates 200 delivery vans purchased in the same year. Instead of depreciating each individually, they are treated as a group.

Historical Cost vs Fair Value in ASC 360

At the heart of ASC 360 is the balance between historical cost accounting and fair value measurement. Both concepts are essential, but they serve different purposes in financial reporting.

Historical Cost Accounting

• Definition: Assets are initially recorded at the cost of acquisition, including purchase price, installation, and other directly attributable expenses.
• Benefit: Provides an objective and verifiable basis for reporting.
• Limitation: Over time, historical cost may no longer reflect an asset’s true economic value, especially in volatile markets.

Fair Value Determination

• Definition: Fair value represents the price that would be received to sell an asset in an orderly transaction between market participants.
• When applied: Used primarily during impairment testing under ASC 360.
• Methods:
  • Independent appraisals.
  • Discounted cash flow analysis.
  • Comparable market transactions.

Why the Distinction Matters

• A building purchased for $2 million in 2005 may still be carried at its historical cost, less depreciation. But if current market value drops to $1.5 million, impairment testing ensures the balance sheet reflects this decline.
• Without fair value adjustments, companies risk overstating their assets and misleading stakeholders.

By requiring historical cost as the baseline and fair value for impairment analysis, ASC 360 strikes a balance between objectivity and economic reality. This dual approach provides clarity for investors, auditors, and managers, ensuring financial reports remain both reliable and relevant.

Asset Retirement Obligations (AROs) Under ASC 360

Asset Retirement Obligations (AROs) are legal or contractual duties to dismantle, remove, or restore long-lived assets at the end of their useful lives. Under ASC 360, these obligations must be recognized as liabilities when they can be reasonably estimated.

Recognition of AROs

• Initial recognition: The fair value of the retirement obligation is recorded as a liability, with a corresponding increase to the carrying amount of the related asset.
• Subsequent adjustments: Over time, the liability is updated to reflect changes in expected cash flows, discount rates, or regulatory requirements.
• Expense recognition: As the asset is depreciated, the liability is gradually settled, impacting both the balance sheet and income statement.

Practical Industry Examples

• Energy and utilities: Decommissioning nuclear plants, dismantling oil rigs, or closing coal mines often involve significant restoration costs.
• Telecommunications: Removing cell towers or underground cables after contracts expire.
• Manufacturing: Restoring leased facilities to their original condition after operations cease.

Why AROs Matter

Failing to account for AROs can significantly distort financial statements. For example, a company may appear more profitable in the short term if it ignores dismantling costs, but future stakeholders will face unexpected liabilities. ASC 360 prevents this by requiring that retirement obligations be recognized upfront, ensuring transparency and long-term accountability.

By formalizing ARO recognition, ASC 360 reinforces the principle that asset management is not just about acquisition and use, but also about responsible disposal and compliance with environmental and contractual obligations.

Capitalizable Costs and Real Estate Transactions

Beyond impairment and depreciation, ASC 360 also provides guidance on capitalizable costs and specific rules for real estate transactions. These provisions ensure that companies accurately record the economic impact of acquiring, improving, or disposing of long-lived assets.

Capitalizable Costs Under ASC 360

Certain costs can be capitalized—meaning added to the asset’s carrying value—instead of being expensed immediately. These include:

• Purchase price of the asset.
• Direct costs of acquisition (installation, delivery, testing).
• Costs of significant improvements or betterments that extend useful life.
  

Example: If a company replaces the roof of a warehouse with a more durable structure, the expenditure is capitalized, as it extends the asset’s life beyond the original estimate. Routine maintenance, however, is expensed.

ASC 360-10-45-9: Costs of Asset Sales

This subsection clarifies that costs incurred in selling property, plant, and equipment—such as legal fees, broker commissions, or transfer taxes—must be recognized when incurred, not added to the asset’s carrying amount.

ASC 360-20: Real Estate Sales

This section addresses the recognition of profit, loss, and costs associated with real estate transactions. It establishes criteria for when a sale can be recognized, focusing on transfer of control and continuing involvement.

• If significant risks or obligations remain with the seller, revenue recognition may be deferred.
• For developers, sales of properties in the ordinary course of business must follow ASC 360-20 guidance to ensure accurate timing of revenue.

Why It Matters

Capitalizing costs properly and applying the rules of ASC 360-20 can materially affect both the balance sheet and income statement. Misclassification may overstate expenses or prematurely recognize revenue, leading to audit issues and potential compliance risks.

By following these rules, companies ensure their financial statements reflect the true economics of asset ownership and disposal—a cornerstone of investor trust and regulatory compliance.

Strategic Importance of ASC 360 for Businesses

Compliance with ASC 360 goes far beyond meeting accounting requirements. It directly shapes how companies manage their resources, evaluate investments, and communicate financial health to the market.

Strengthening Financial Transparency

By ensuring that assets are properly depreciated and impairment losses are recognized, ASC 360 prevents overstated balance sheets. This transparency protects investors and builds long-term credibility with regulators, auditors, and shareholders.

Supporting Valuation and M&A Decisions

Accurate impairment testing and fair value measurement are critical during mergers, acquisitions, and divestitures. Buyers and sellers rely on reliable asset valuations to negotiate fair prices and assess risks. ASC 360 compliance ensures that reported numbers reflect real economic conditions.

Enhancing Risk Management

Monitoring impairment indicators helps executives identify risks earlier, whether from changing market conditions, new regulations, or operational shifts. This allows companies to adapt strategies proactively, rather than reacting after losses are realized.

Protecting Access to Capital

Lenders and investors closely examine compliance with US GAAP standards. By following ASC 360, businesses reinforce trust and improve their ability to secure financing on favorable terms.

Driving Better Strategic Decisions

From deciding whether to expand a production line to planning asset retirements, companies with accurate and transparent asset reporting are better positioned to allocate capital efficiently.

In short, ASC 360 is not just an accounting rule—it is a strategic tool. Organizations that approach compliance proactively gain more than regulatory peace of mind; they gain a competitive edge in efficiency, credibility, and decision-making power.

Achieving ASC 360 Compliance With CPCON

Navigating the complexities of ASC 360 requires more than technical accounting knowledge. It demands a strategic approach that combines compliance, valuation expertise, and technology-driven asset management. This is where the Grupo CPCON stands out as a global leader.

Why Partner With CPCON?

• Expertise in valuation and impairment testing: With more than 25 years of experience, CPCON supports organizations in ensuring that their financial statements reflect the true value of their property, plant, and equipment.
• Advanced technology integration: From RFID-based tracking to digital platforms for asset management, CPCON offers solutions that bring precision and transparency to compliance processes.
• Customized strategies: Every organization faces unique challenges. CPCON tailors its methodologies to the specific asset structure, industry, and regulatory environment of each client.
• Global perspective: Operating across the Americas, CPCON aligns local GAAP requirements such as ASC 360 with international standards like IAS 36, ensuring consistency for multinational businesses.

The CPCON Advantage

CPCON is more than a service provider—it is a strategic partner. By combining innovation, technical expertise, and a commitment to excellence, CPCON empowers companies to comply with ASC 360 while also strengthening their financial resilience and decision-making capabilities.

With CPCON by your side, compliance becomes an opportunity to innovate, grow, and secure the future of your business.

Conclusion: ASC 360 Compliance Made Clear

ASC 360 is more than an accounting standard—it is a framework that ensures property, plant, and equipment are managed with accuracy, transparency, and strategic insight. By following its principles, organizations protect investor trust, strengthen financial reporting, and gain the clarity needed for better decision-making.

For businesses across industries, compliance with ASC 360 is not optional. It is essential for maintaining credibility, securing access to capital, and managing risks effectively.

Ready to simplify ASC 360 compliance?

Partner with CPCON to ensure accurate asset valuation, transparent reporting, and full compliance with US GAAP. Our global team combines advanced technology and deep expertise to transform complex requirements into clear, actionable strategies.

Contact the experts at CPCON and take full control of your assets with confidence.

FAQ

What is ASC 360 in accounting?

ASC 360 is the US GAAP standard issued by FASB that provides guidance on accounting for property, plant, and equipment. It covers acquisition, depreciation, impairment, and disposal of long-lived assets.

How does ASC 360 define impairment of assets?

Under ASC 360, an impairment occurs when the carrying amount of an asset is not recoverable. Companies must test for impairment using undiscounted cash flows and, if necessary, adjust to fair value.

Who must comply with ASC 360 requirements?

All entities that follow US GAAP—including public companies, private businesses, nonprofits, and government entities—are required to comply with ASC 360.

What is the difference between ASC 360 and IAS 36?

While ASC 360 applies specifically to long-lived assets, IAS 36 has a broader scope covering all assets. ASC 360 uses a two-step impairment test, while IAS 36 uses a one-step approach.

What costs can be capitalized under ASC 360?

Capitalizable costs include purchase price, installation, delivery, and major improvements that extend an asset’s useful life. Routine maintenance is not capitalized and must be expensed.

Get to Know CPCON Group: A global expert in asset management and inventory solutions

CPCON Group is a global leader in asset management, fixed asset control, and RFID technology. With over 25 years of experience, we have supported major companies such as Nestlé, Pfizer, Scania, BASF, Coca-Cola Andina, Vale, Vivo, Petrobras, and Caixa in high-complexity projects.

Curious about our global footprint? We are present in:

• North America: Toronto, New York, Miami, Minneapolis, Seattle, Dallas
• Latin America: São Paulo, Buenos Aires, Lima, Bogotá, Mexico City
• Europe: Lisbon, Porto, London, Birmingham, Milan, Rome, Turin, Madrid, Bilbao
• Middle East: Dubai, Saudi Arabi
• Caribbean: Tortola, Grand Cayman

Follow our LinkedIn Showcase Page and stay updated with strategic content on asset control, inventory management, and RFID innovation across industries.

ASC 360 is a US GAAP standard that governs accounting for property, plant, and equipment, covering acquisition, depreciation, impairment, and disposal. It ensures accurate financial reporting by requiring impairment testing, fair value adjustments, and specific disclosure requirements. The standard applies to all entities reporting under GAAP and differs from IAS 36 in scope and methodology. By aligning with ASC 360, businesses strengthen transparency, improve risk management, and build investor confidence. With advanced expertise and technology, CPCON supports global companies in achieving full compliance and turning ASC 360 into a strategic advantage.