Articles & guides

2 CFR 200.313(d)(1) requires a specific set of data elements in your equipment property records — description, serial number, funding source/FAIN, title, cost, federal share, location, condition, and disposition. Here's the full list and how to maintain it.

FQHCs and Health Care for the Homeless programs are subject to federal property standards. Here's how 45 CFR 75.320 and 2 CFR 200.313 apply, what's changing in the HHS transition, and how to keep grant-funded medical equipment audit-ready.

The most common Single Audit findings on equipment aren't about misreading the rule — they're execution failures. Here's why organizations get property-management findings under 2 CFR 200.313 and how to avoid them.

ISO 55000, 55001, and 55002 are not interchangeable — only one is certifiable. Here's exactly what each standard covers.

What ISO 55001 requires for asset identification and register data integrity — real clauses, 2014 vs 2024 differences, and where physical verification fits.

Why financial and operational asset registers diverge, what ISO/TS 55010:2024 recommends, and the real cost of unreconciled ghost assets.

The precise clause-by-clause breakdown behind ISO 55001 asset data quality — 2014 vs 2024 editions compared.

Barcode, QR, or RFID — and how to structure functional locations, equipment numbers, and finance asset numbers for ISO 55001.

What ISO 55001 auditors expect as evidence of asset existence and condition — and how clause 8.3 governs outsourced verification.

The difference between Stage 1 and Stage 2 ISO 55001 audits, common asset-data nonconformities, and a practical readiness checklist.

Turn the fixed asset register into a material control for the Provision 29 declaration: ownership, reconciliation and the evidence boards rely on.

How physical verification, floor-to-book reconciliation and ISA (UK) 501 practice build the audit evidence behind a material controls declaration.

A practical guide to assembling the board’s evidence base for the Provision 29 declaration: assurance mapping, dry runs and physical asset evidence.

Provision 29 of the UK Corporate Governance Code frames fixed-asset controls as material controls. See what boards must evidence for the declaration.

Safeguarding of assets, from custody records to security tagging, is a candidate material control under Provision 29. See how boards evidence it.

UK SOX never arrived. Compare Provision 29’s board declaration with Sarbanes-Oxley 404: scope, attestation and what it means for asset controls.

What IMMEX and Anexo 24 require for imported machinery: the fixed-asset module, pedimento reconciliation, SAT audits, and floor-to-record verification.

Learn the fixed asset audit process: 7 steps, procedures, and a printable checklist — and when to hire a specialist audit firm vs. audit in-house.

See how auditors decide fixed-asset audit sample size and which assets to physically verify — statistical vs. judgmental sampling, key items, and two-directional testing.

Learn how to audit fixed assets step by step — plan, verify existence two-directionally, reconcile to the GL, test additions, disposals, and depreciation. Start now.

Decide when you need an independent, third-party fixed-asset audit instead of an internal one — and how to choose an objective, multi-site verification provider.

When SAP PM logs a component replacement, FI-AA rarely derecognizes the old part — creating ghost components on your fixed-asset register. The mechanism, the IAS 16 exposure, and how to close it.

The existence assertion tests whether recorded PP&E actually exists. See how a verified, evidence-backed asset register is your audit + SOX 404 proof.

Measure GAAP inventory at the lower of cost and net realizable value under ASC 330. See the NRV test, allowed cost-flow methods, and physical-count rules.