CPCON delivers engineering-based cost segregation studies that accelerate depreciation deductions, improve cash flow, and reduce tax liability. Our studies meet the highest IRS standards for defensibility.
Speak with our valuation experts today
Most property owners overpay taxes by depreciating building components over 39 years when shorter recovery periods apply. CPCON identifies every opportunity.
Standard depreciation schedules often assign 39-year lives to building components that qualify for 5, 7, or 15-year recovery periods, leaving significant tax savings unrealized.
Distinguishing between structural and non-structural building components requires engineering expertise and detailed knowledge of IRS guidelines and court precedents.
Cost segregation studies face increasing IRS scrutiny. Studies must be prepared by qualified professionals using methodologies that meet the IRS Audit Techniques Guide standards.
Determining the optimal time to perform a study—at acquisition, construction completion, or retroactively via a catch-up method—requires strategic tax planning coordination.
Phase-down of 100% bonus depreciation and evolving tax legislation require careful analysis of timing strategies to maximize first-year deductions before rates decline.
The IRS requires engineering-based cost segregation studies. Desktop or estimate-based approaches lack the detail and defensibility needed to withstand examination.
Our team of engineers and tax professionals delivers studies that maximize deductions while maintaining full IRS compliance and audit defensibility.
Detailed engineering-based analysis of newly constructed properties to identify and reclassify building components into shorter depreciation recovery periods.

How economic shifts and supply chain disruptions are impacting fair market values for industrial machinery and manufacturing equipment across sectors.
Understanding how new lease accounting standards affect fixed asset reporting and the critical role of accurate asset valuations for compliance.
Key differences between valuation methodologies for insurance purposes and how to ensure adequate coverage for your fixed asset portfolio.
Best practices for conducting thorough fixed asset due diligence during M&A transactions to identify risks and validate asset values.